A Semantic Tableau Version of First-Order Quasi-Classical Logic
نویسنده
چکیده
Quasi-classical logic (QC logic) allows the derivation of non-trivial classical inferences from inconsistent information. A paraconsis-tent, or non-trivializable, logic is, by necessity, a compromise, or weakening , of classical logic. The compromises on QC logic seem to be more appropriate than other paraconsistent logics for applications in computing. In particular, the connectives behave in a \classical manner" at the object level so that important proof rules such as modus tollens, modus ponens, and disjunctive syllogism hold. Here we develop QC logic by presenting a semantic tableau version for rst-order QC logic.
منابع مشابه
A Completion–Based Method for Adding Equality to Free Variable Semantic Tableaux
For both classical and nonclassical first–order logic equality is a crucial feature to increase expressivity of the object language. It is, therefore, of great importance to have a method at hand that allows tableau–based theorem provers to handle equality in an efficient way. In the first approaches to adding equality to semantic tableaux [8, 10, 11] additional tableau rules were defined that ...
متن کاملReasoning in Description Logic with Semantic Tableau Binary Trees
An alternative version of the tableau decision making algorithm defined in the ”Handbook of Description Logics” (Baader et col.) is presented. It is a version of semi-decidable tableau formal system that corresponds with that one of first order logic and shares its semantic soundness and completeness. In examples the advantages of the transparent tree-style representation algorithm, comparing w...
متن کاملTableau methods of proof for modal logics
1 Introduction: In [1] Fitch proposed a new proof proceedure for several standard modal logics. The chief characteristic of this was the inclusion in the object language, of symbols representing worlds in Kripke models. In this paper we incorporate the device into a tableau proof system and it is seen that the resulting (propositional) proof system is highly analogous to a classical first order...
متن کاملKripke semantics and proof systems for combining intuitionistic logic and classical logic
We combine intuitionistic logic and classical logic into a new, first-order logic called Polarized Intuitionistic Logic. This logic is based on a distinction between two dual polarities which we call red and green to distinguish them from other forms of polarization. The meaning of these polarities is defined model-theoretically by a Kripke-style semantics for the logic. Two proof systems are a...
متن کاملA Tableau Algorithm for Handling Inconsistency in OWL
In Semantic Web, the knowledge sources usually contain inconsistency because they are constantly changing and from different view points. As is well known, as based on the description logic, OWL is lack of the ability of tolerating inconsistent or incomplete data. Recently, the research in handling inconsistency in OWL becomes more and more important. In this paper, we present a paraconsistent ...
متن کامل